What Shoes Work Best With Arthritic Knees?

What Shoes Work Best With Arthritic Knees?

WEDNESDAY, Jan. 13, 2021 (HealthDay News) — Lots of Americans suffer from painful arthritic knees, but a new study finds that wearing the right type of shoe may help ease discomfort.

Patients with knee arthritis will achieve greater pain relief by opting for sturdy and supportive shoes rather than flat flexible footwear, researchers in Australia found.

“A ‘sturdy supportive shoe’ is a shoe that gives stability to the foot, via motion control features such as arch support,” explained study author Rana Hinman, a professor of physiotherapy at the University of Melbourne. “It also has a thick, cushioned heel and a rigid sole that does not bend easily.”

In contrast, Hinman noted, “a ‘flat flexible shoe’ is more lightweight, contains no arch support or motion control features, has a low heel (i.e., flat) with minimal/no cushioning and has a flexible sole that bends easily.”

Roughly 1 in 4 adults over the age of 45 has arthritic knees, Hinman noted.

One U.S. expert unconnected to the study agreed that “bum knees” will probably feel better with special footwear.

“I think it’s pretty intuitive that a structured shoe will be more stable and better for arthritis patients,” said Dr. Jeffrey Schildhorn, an orthopedic surgeon at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City. “I’ve found that to be true in my practice and in my life. But this study is the first to really look at this in a rigorous way, and to show with good science that this isn’t just anecdotal.”

Foot support matters

As the Australian team noted, people with creaky, painful knees are often advised to wear shoes with support. But there’s also a school of thought that flat flexible shoes may deliver greater benefit because they provide more of a “barefoot” experience.

The latter theory didn’t win out in the new study. After working with 164 knee arthritis patients in the Melbourne area, Hinman’s team found that “58% of people who wore sturdy supportive shoes experienced a meaningful reduction in knee pain on walking, compared to only 40% of the people who wore flat flexible shoes.”

Study participants were 50 years old and older. Prior to the study’s launch, all had experienced near constant knee pain in the prior month (rated at a 4 or greater on a pain scale of 11), and most had worn shoes that featured a mix of sturdy and flat characteristics.

Between 2017 and 2019, half were randomly assigned to wear a flat flexible shoe for at least six hours a day over six months, while the other half was assigned stable supportive footwear. (The team did not compare shoes distributed in the study with the ones patients regularly wore.)

All footwear was commercially available. For the flat variety, the brands included: Merrell Bare Access (for men and women); Vivobarefoot Primus Lite (men and women); Vivobarefoot Mata Canvas (men); Converse Dainty Low (women); and Lacoste Marice.

Stable variety brands included ASICS Kayano (for men and women); Merrell Jungle Moc (men); Nike Air Max 90 Ultra (women); Rockport Edge Hill (men); and New Balance 624 (women).

Each patient was able to switch between two brands throughout the trial. Investigators kept track of reported knee pain levels while walking, functional ability, overall quality of life indicators and overall physical activity levels.

In the end, the team determined that while stable supportive shoes did not restore greater mobility to patients than flat flexible shoes, they did offer a leg up on knee and hip pain reduction and improved quality of life.

‘A Rolls-Royce over potholes’

As well, Hinman noted that “sturdy supportive shoes were much less likely to cause adverse effects at the knee and other joints, such as ankle/foot pain [or] knee swelling.” Moreover, people who wore flat flexible shoes reported twice as many adverse effects as people who wore sturdy supportive shoes, she said.

The upshot: “Shoes are an easy option that can help people self-manage their knee osteoarthritis pain,” Hinman said. “Patients with knee osteoarthritis should think carefully about their footwear and choose shoes that are most likely to reduce their knee pain.”

Schildhorn agreed.

“For someone with knee arthritis,” he said, “a structured shoe is almost like a Rolls-Royce going over potholes. Because the problem with an arthritic knee is that the joints aren’t aligned correctly, and aren’t nearly as supple anymore. And it has cartilage with gaps, like cobblestones, which wear away.”

A structured shoe can absorb those issues, said Schildhorn. But an unstructured shoe or a bare foot “relies on all of the joints of the body to work just as they were designed. They all have to be aligned correctly, the ligaments have to be functional, and the joints have to be supple in order to absorb loads when walking in uneven areas. Because you need your body to be able to adjust to variances.”

The U.S.-based Arthritis Foundation agrees that patients should pay attention to the style and fit of the shoes they wear. But it cites mixed findings as to best practices.

For example, foundation experts acknowledge that stable shoes and boots (without heels) can indeed be helpful for some.

However, they also highlight prior knee research indicating that some flat shoes — such as flip-flops — may trigger less knee stress than more stable shoes. Others, however, such as loosely strapped sandals and so-called “foot gloves,” may prove problematic.

But the foundation has one piece of overriding advice: Never favor style over function and comfort.

The results were published Jan. 11 in the Annals of Internal Medicine.

More information

There’s more on shoe wear and arthritis at the Arthritis Foundation.

SOURCES: Jeffrey Schildhorn, MD, orthopedic surgeon, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York City; Rana Hinman, PhD, professor, department of physiotherapy, University of Melbourne, Australia; Annals of Internal Medicine, Jan. 11, 2021

Copyright ©2020 HealthDay. All rights reserved.
Knee Procedure Done Earlier Might Prevent Knee Replacement Later

Knee Procedure Done Earlier Might Prevent Knee Replacement Later

MONDAY, Feb. 1, 2021 (HealthDay News) — For some patients suffering from knee arthritis, a special procedure may reduce the need for a total knee replacement, Canadian researchers say.

By getting what is known as a ‘high tibial osteotomy,’ younger patients with less severe joint damage who are physically active might be able to delay the need for a knee replacement by 10 years or more, though they may have to search for a doctor who performs the surgery.

“High tibial osteotomy is a knee surgery aimed at treating patients in earlier stages of osteoarthritis by correcting the alignment of bowed legs and shifting load to less diseased parts of the knee,” explained lead researcher Trevor Birmingham, the Canada research chair of musculoskeletal rehabilitation at the University of Western Ontario.

During the procedure, the tibia (shinbone) is cut and then reshaped to relieve pressure on the knee joint.

Beyond improving pain and function, a goal of the procedure is to prevent or delay the need for total knee replacement, Birmingham said.

Although high tibial osteotomy can improve pain and function and is cost-effective, the procedure is underused in North America, Birmingham said. “Rates of high tibial osteotomy continue to decline, while rates of other knee surgeries continue to rise,” he added.

“The low rates of high tibial osteotomy are partially due to the perception that the procedure is only suitable for a very specific subset of patients with knee osteoarthritis, and that the patients will go on to require total joint replacement anyway. So why bother?” Birmingham said.

But the researchers found that among nearly 600 people in the study who had a high tibial osteotomy, 95% did not need a total knee replacement within five years, and 79% did not get a total knee replacement within 10 years.

Even patients not usually considered good candidates for high tibial osteotomy, such as women and those with later-stage disease, 70% did not need a knee replacement within 10 years, the researchers found.

“Knees treated earlier in the disease process had the highest longevity after high tibial osteotomy, with 87% not getting a total knee replacement within 10 years,” Birmingham said.

The findings from this study suggest that high tibial osteotomy has the potential to delay or prevent the need for total knee replacement, bringing the limited use of high tibial osteotomy into question, he said.

Dr. Jeffrey Schildhorn, an orthopedic surgeon at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City, reviewed the study and said that the goal of this procedure is to realign the knee to help prevent arthritis progression in younger patients.

“The high tibial osteotomy is designed to help patients avoid the knee replacement altogether, or at the very least to get further along in life before it’s necessary,” he said. “The idea behind the operation is solid, and in the right patient, it’s absolutely the right thing to do.”

Schildhorn said the one downside of the procedure is that patients have to keep their weight off the knee for at least a month after a high tibial osteotomy, which is one reason it’s only used for patients strong enough to use crutches.

“When I treat patients, one of the things that limits me in offering certain things is what I think they can tolerate, so if I see someone who I don’t think is going to be able to get through the nuanced rehabilitation that’s going to be required, like not putting weight on it for four to six weeks and the arduous physical therapy that can be involved, I won’t offer them something like this,” Schildhorn said.

He also said that whether a patient is offered a high tibial osteotomy depends on the doctor the patient sees.

“In other words, usually the doctors who do joint replacements don’t do this, and vice versa,” Schildhorn said. “It depends on the philosophy of the surgeon; there are surgeons who are joint replacement surgeons and there are surgeons who are joint-preserving, and some crossover. But for the most part, it depends on your philosophy and how you frame your practice — there’s a lot less doctors who specialize in osteotomy than specialize in joint replacement.”

Patients need to do their homework, he noted.

“Ask your doctor, “Would this be right for me? Would this preserve my knee for longer? And do you think I’m a good candidate?'” Schildhorn said. “You have to arm people with information so they can understand the risks — basically that’s what informed consent really is.”

The report was published Feb. 1 in the Canadian Medical Association Journal.

More information

For more on knee osteoarthritis, see the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

SOURCES: Trevor Birmingham, Ph.D., professor and Canada research chair, musculoskeletal rehabilitation, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada; Jeffrey Schildhorn, MD, orthopedic surgeon, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York City; Canadian Medical Association Journal, Feb. 1, 2021

Copyright ©2020 HealthDay. All rights reserved.
Call Now Button